Barack Obama’s EuroTour No Help
From CNN, (gasp, they actually tell the truth on this one?) according to their latest opinion poll; Barack Obama’s recent EuroTour was supposed to help get him elected president of the World, but while Europeans may love him, Obama didn’t get the rocket blast in points he was expecting. Instead, he may have gotten only one over John McCain, the Republican nominee for POTUS. Obama’s percentage currently stands at 51 over McCain’s 44. Previously the percentage was 50-45.
Maybe more Americans saw the improper and unethical, yet not illegal, way in which Obama is trying to get himself elected. By making the Europeans love him, Barack is hoping that this will boost his status at home in the eyes of the people. After all, what Europe thinks of Obama is more important than what the voters in America think of Obama because Obama wants to model the US and the World after the European Union. The EU is so great you know. It is like a utopia.
Or maybe that is exactly the problem that Obama can’t see, that Americans don’t want their politicians to do as the EU does, that we here in American want to be governed by the greatest models for government and freedoms ever written, The Constitution of the United States of America, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence.
Obama for World President
In the opening of his Germany speech, Barack Obama states that he is not speaking as a candidate for president (note he leaves out “of the United States of America”), but as a “proud” citizen of the United States of America and a citizen of the world. Of course, the crowd applauds this opening quite enthusiastically. He also says that he comes as many of his fellow “countrymen” have come before. Really? Not any other countrymen have gone and spoken to Germany on this scale and under these circumstances. If he is speaking as a citizen, why is he there? As a presidential candidate. If he were not running for President of the United States of America, he would not be there, period. So right from the start he is being deceitful and no one notices.
Immediately after this Obama goes into his “walls” speech and talks about how America and Germany worked together to rebuild Germany three years after the end of World War II. There is no mention whatsoever of Hitler and the atrocities of Germany that got them into that situation in the first place, or how Berlin got divided into two different cities. As Obama talks, he makes it sound as if the German people got to where they are today mostly by themselves with a little help from the United States of America.
The truth is, without a lot of help from the United States of America, Germany would not be in the position they are today and the Berlin Wall would probably still be up. Not that the German people didn’t do a lot of work and persevered, but Obama almost reluctantly gives America some credit, and then mentions a massive food drop that failed due to weather as if to say, well, America tried but we didn’t give it our best shot. In other words, he makes it sound as if America did little to help the situation without coming right out and saying it. Another slight of hand from Obama.
Less than nine minutes into his speech, Obama brings up the subject of global warming, or the more politically correct “global climate change” (which allows any adverse weather conditions to be blamed on mankind). In typical liberal fashion, Obama blames “cars in Boston and factories in Beijing,” for melting the ice caps in the Arctic and shrinking coastlines in the Atlantic (but wait, aren’t the melting polar caps supposed to be making the oceans rise?). Then Obama goes on to say that the same are causing droughts to the farms of Kansas to Kenya.
Again with the global warming, or climate change. Where is the proof? What caused recorded droughts before cars and factories dotted the planet? And haven’t the polar ice caps been melting since the end of the ice age? And if they weren’t melting, what would keep the oceans from evaporating? For every scientist that says mankind is causing global climate change there is one that says mankind is not, but those latter scientists’ voices are cut off by the liberal main stream media and the Democrats, and they are denounced as heretics by their colleagues.
Without taking a breath, Obama then delves into third world violence and genocide and goes on how no country can tackle these problems alone, and none of can deny these threats or escape responsibility of meeting them. Obama fails to mention the useless United Nations, which has the responsibility to tackle these situations and ask the member nations for help. Instead, the UN does nothing but try to cover up internal corruption and print out useless documents that attempt to undermine the wishes of the member nations that wish to address the problems facing the world. Often the UN is rife with anti US and Israel rhetoric and as a result, nothing gets accomplished.
Moving rather quickly, Obama says more on global citizenship, more working together despite our differences and different approaches to world problems. “The burdens of global citizenship continue to bind us together.” Really? How so? Part of the burden that is occurring right now is the attempt by Arab nations to overthrow Israel. No nation is bound together to stop this threat to Israel, but many are bound together to destroy Israel and the Jews. The list of world wide atrocities is long, yet no one has bound themselves together to stop any of them.
Now we return to the walls. Among those walls that must come down are the walls between Christians, Jews, and Muslims. Christians and Jews have been actively trying to bring those walls down for many decades, yet Islam continues to hold them up, and gets fiercer with each passing year in their determination to build one wall, the wall that contains only followers of Islam. Obama does not mention that Islam is the single biggest problem facing the world today and puts up walls not only between nations, but walls between people within nations. Until the Muslims stop their attempt to force worldwide Islamic law on the planet, these walls will not fall.
Next, Obama briefly mentions the prosperity of a united Europe, but doesn’t come out and actually mention the European Union. He also doesn’t mention that Europe has had more problems and strife as a result of the EU (Obama Wants to Change the World To European Model). This leads Obama to talk about true partnerships and true progress, and how both require constant work. This is true, but there are just too many differences of opinion in the way that world problems should be handled. These partnerships, according to Obama, need allies that listen to each other, learn from each other, and trust each other.
New world order? It appears this is what Obama wants as he talks about peace and building global bridges and joining together through cooperation, strong institutions, shared sacrifice, and a global commitment to progress to meet the challenges of the 21st Century. This talk of peace and globalization and sacrifice is Obama’s way of saying that he wants open borders worldwide and a single government to run the planet. Complete globalization and sacrifice. The biggest sacrifice that will occur here will be on the part of America as we will be forced to give up our Constitution and our civil liberties for a one world government. This is stuff to be very afraid of, and to fight.
Obama does finally admit that terrorism and terrorists are a world problem, however he says that if we join in a new and global partnership with the vast majority of Muslims who reject extremism we can defeat the hate. Again, Obama hints at a new, one world order, but where are the vast majority of Muslims who hate Muslim extremists? Where are their voices, where have they been? How come they aren’t screaming out in the Main Stream Media against the continual worldwide terrorist attacks and the continuing imposition of Sharia Law on people who don’t want it?
I find it amazing that Obama speaks of Afghanistan and says that we have too much at stake there to turn back now. He makes it sound as if we have an obligation to protect the people of Afghanistan from the Taliban, But what about Iraq? Are those people there not worthy of the same effort? Obama has always made it clear that he wants to remove our troops from Iraq and that we have lost whatever we were fighting for there, but he wants to continue efforts in Afghanistan.
This is the same pick and chose our battles attitude that the United Nations has. If it seems we can win there, do something good for the people there, and make a good name for ourselves, it is a worthy battle. However, if it looks like it will be too tough, cost us too much, and give us a black eye before the world, we cut and run. Another example of lofty liberal ideals, we only help those when helping them moves us upward in status before the world. All others, sorry, but you are on your own.
Now we jump to nuclear weapons. Obama talks about peace without nukes and stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, basically saying we don’t need them anymore. But what about the countries that have them now that never did before? While the world superpowers have reduced the arsenals of nuclear weapons, the smaller countries that hate everyone else in the world have either developed nukes or are developing them. Iran and North Korea have thrown their hats into the atom ring are are more of a threat to their neighbors than the United States of America and Russia were to each other during the height of the Cold War.
Switching into his new world order phase again, Obama mentions that there is a need for a strong European Union that deepens security and prosperity while extending its hand abroad. Again, Obama is alluding to a one world order based on the EU. He even mentions working with Russia to assist in securing the entire continent. But what about individual freedoms and values. Does not Barack understand that we have these different nations and governments because people believe in different ideals? Some of those ideals involve total freedom with government controlled by the people, while others involve minimal freedoms with the people controlled by the government. In a one world order, which would it be? Who would have the voice, the people or the government?
Obama moves so swiftly that I am sure most people are not absorbing the true implications of what he is saying, even today. For his next part he goes on about the wealth of capitalism (though he doesn’t use the exact word) and how it should be controlled so that everyone gets a piece of the pie (its called Communism), and “trade that is free and fair for all.” Not one single “free trade agreement” has ever been free and fair for all. Every example has shown that one side gets all the goods and the jobs, and the other side loses all the jobs and pays all the import/export taxes. Trade between the US and Mexico and the US and China are the greatest example of trade agreements that work for only one government and work against the laborers of both nations. Trade agreements lower working wages for both sides and allow corporations only to make more money not the worker, and these trade agreements usually cost one of the nations, in both cases the US, tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of jobs for the labor force.
The man is amazingly deceptive. Even as he closes out emphasizing free speech and freedoms for all, fairness and equality for all, one must think back on his talk of partnerships and united countries working together. Within these words lies a one world order based on the European Union. Under a one world order there can be no equality and fairness for all. Under the EU there is no fairness for all. Individual rights become squashed under the preference to do what is right for the governments, not the people.
The Cold War will have been fought for nothing because what Barack Obama alludes to in his speech is called Communism. We fought it because we saw the human atrocities in Russia before the Iron Curtain fell. We fight it now because we see the human atrocities in North Korea, North Vietnam, and China.
Is this the direction we want to go? Do we want a government that frowns on businesses making money and people being wealthy, even those who have made their wealth through hard honest work? Do we want to pay more taxes than we are now for all our goods? Do we want to see increased famine and poverty, higher costs of living, a limit on how much money you make? Do you really want just one “united” government dictating to the world how much freedom you have?
Do not kid yourselves. A one world government would bring about the end of the United States of America as we know her, a forced redistribution of wealth, and the loss of individual liberties, and a one world government would dissolve our papers granting us inalienable rights.
Obama can talk about equality and fairness for all, the truth is, a one world government is not equal and fair for all, and those losing the most and making the biggest sacrifice would be us right here in our own country, the United States of America.
“Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!” — Thomas Paine
Emphasis Change
From now until November I am changing the emphasis of my blog. I am going to post everything I can about why we cannot allow Barack Obama to be elected President of the United States. This man is dangerous to the inalienable rights granted to us by the Constitution of the United States of America. He is dangerous to our civil liberties that I hold dear.
If this man gets elected, all those who founded our country and our freedoms will have produced the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States of America, and the Bill of Rights for nothing.
God bless America and God help America.
Comments on Obama’s Germany speech still to come.
The Audacity of Obama; the New Messiah
The following is disturbing to say the least. If any of the rumors on the linked article below are true, we may be seeing the predictions of the end times in the Bible commencing in our life time.
Obama Wants To Change The World To European Union Model
Barack Obama thinks that the EU has reached some type of mythical utopia status and wants the world to be like the EU. The Obamessiah needs to wake up to reality and see the reasons he is wrong to think that the EU is great and the world needs to emulate it.
1. Higher Unemployment Rate. While the EU has dropped the unemployment rate (it raised dramatically after the formation of the EU), it is still higher than the US unemployment rate. Compare the US at 5.5% while the EU average is 6.8%. Not a real difference, but that is the average among the nations in the EU with Spain at the highest with 9.6% unemployment as of April, which is higher than January which was 9%. Austria and Ireland are also seeing increasing unemployment since the beginning of 2008.
2. Higher Tax Rate. The current tax rate is 40.5%, 12 percentage points more than the US, and the current trend is upward. The EU is working hard to reduce current upward trends after seeing a drop in unemployment that was at one time around 14%.
3. Higher Gas Prices. We already know Obama wants to raise the gas tax dramatically to get us “off oil”, but in reality that is a ploy to get more of our tax dollars to spend on programs the Democrats like that don’t work. In 2005 EU countries saw a 16% hike in fuel prices. The current average price for fuel in the EU is $8.70 a gallon when converted to US figures. The tax on fuel in the EU is 70%. The US national average is 11%.
4. Higher Food Prices. There is no question that the price of food around the world is being driven up by the increased use E85, corn ethanol for fuel. In the EU the effect is more severe. By April, 2008, food prices increased at double the EU inflation rate (inflation rate increased by 3.6% while food increased at 7.1%) with dairy products seeing the highest surge at 15%. The highest single national increase was felt by Bulgaria with a whopping 25.4% increase.
As a result of the above problems, Europe and the EU have seen food riots and gas riots as well and gas blockades, where truck drivers block refineries and distribution centers to protest the high diesel prices. The US has yet to see any riots related to food and gas prices. Teenagers literally prowl the streets and wreak havoc because they are the most affected by unemployment in the EU states.
Because statistics vary in collection between EU nations, there is no average of the increase in juvenile crime in the EU. However, a study was implemented and found that since the creation of the EU in 1993, juvenile crime has risen between 50 and 100% in ALL member nations of the EU. Taken into consideration in this study were the different ages each nation considers a citizen a minor and how each member nation reports juvenile crime (National Institute of Justice Research Preview: Trends in Juvenile Violence in European Countries – Based on a presentation by Christian Pfeiffer, Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachsen (Hanover, Germany)).
So, this is the EU model utopia that Barack Obama wants for the US as well as the world; higher taxes, higher food and fuel prices, higher unemployment, and riots over food and gas prices as well as gas blockades. I predict that were these things to come to pass in the US if Obama is elected, Obama would either call out the National Guard or declare martial law. After all, all of his ideas are great ones and how dare the American people disagree with him. If you do, you must be racist.
Another American School Bows To The Will of Islam
Unfortunately, I can say I am not surprised to read about this. Misunderstanding and misguided teachers and principles are giving way to the wishes of Islam. From forcing children to learn about Islam to punishing them for not saying prayers to Allah during Islamic “demonstrations”, our schools are sending hypocritical messages to our children. It is not acceptable to allow God and Christ in school or allow Christians to have influence in schools, but hey, let’s do what the Muslims want so we don’t offend them. This is disturbing.
The story – Allah is offended (by the Pledge of Allegiance?) – from Right Commentary.
The Obamessiah.
Update – Okay, we’ll shoot for Sunday.
Ran afoul of time and lost. I hope to finish my lengthy tirade about Obama tomorrow.
Obama’s Ego Trip
Stay tuned… my thoughts on Obama’s EuroTour and today’s speech in Germany tomorrow. Folks, Obama is scary. If elected president, look to see our liberties dissolve one at a time as he pursues his dream of a one world government.
Obama Thinks EuroTour Will Show His Ability To Lead
Barack Obama thinks that his EuroTour will show Americans that he is a capable leader according to his campaign.
Obama’s speech was the centerpiece of a fast-paced tour through Europe designed to reassure skeptical voters back home about his ability to lead the country and take a frayed cross-Atlantic alliance in a new direction after eight years of the Bush administration.
All this shows is that his words are nothing but rhetoric and that he cares more about the opinions of other countries than he does of the opinions of his own country. Since when does a presidential candidate need to woo the entire world in order to get elected President of the United States? And just how much is this EuroTour costing the American taxpayer just in security measures?
Personally, I am not impressed by any presidential candidate who speaks more to other countries in order to get voted in in his country. I don’t see all the other country’s candidates coming here to pound the pulpit. Last I knew Obama was running for President of the United States, not President of the World. And his message is, of course, changing as fast as his gym shorts. Obama has often said how he opposes the war in Iraq, yet on his EuroTour, he has spoken that the US and our Allies need to stay together and fight terrorism and terrorists, most specifically in Afghanistan.
“No one welcomes war. … But my country and yours have a stake in seeing that NATO’s first mission beyond Europe’s borders is a success.”
“This threat is real and we cannot shrink from our responsibility to combat it.”
If Obama really believes, or listens to, his own transmutative verbosity, if he really believes in a unified war on terror, then why is he campaigning to pull our troops out of Iraq immediately upon him being president? Or no wait, he wants to pull them all out, but not right away, all of the troops, but not right away, but within 15 months of being elected, but then not all of them right away within 15 months, but only part of them right away within 15 months. Does he or does he not want to pull them out? So, he IS for the war on terror, but not in Iraq, only in Afghanistan?
Obama can’t keep up with his own lies on Iraq, Afghanistan, troop withdrawal, etc. At one point he even said he never said he was going to withdraw the troops, yet he did say what he said despite saying he said he never said that (Barack Obama Flip-Flops Again, and Again, and Again…).
Barack is too wishy-washy to lead this country. He is too dependent on the wishes and wills of other nations and how they want American run, not how Americans want America run. This indecisiveness is unfit for leadership. Obamessiah must not become president. He will be the undoing of our freedoms.
OBAMA LEADS MCCAIN BY ONLY SIX POINTS
So why isn’t this being pointed out in the Main Stream Media? Because they don’t want the sheeple to know that Messiah Obama is slipping in the polls and points. This could be good though, because if the sheeple don’t know about it they (and the MSM) won’t double their lies and efforts to get the Savior of mankind elected president of the world, er, United States.
1 comment